Fullerton v. Kaune’s Empirical Analysis
1963
Citation profile
27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently May 2005 · most notably Elliott Industries Limited Partnership v. Bp America Production Company Bp J (2005), Cooper v. Curry (1979)
27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Humphreys · Paulos v. Janetakos · Pederson v. Lothman · In Re McGee's Estate · Otero v. Dietz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]t matters not whether the production from a mineral well is claimed or whether a portion of the fund resulting from the sale of the production is claimed; in New Mexico, both assets are realty.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““ * * * A joint adventure is formed when, by agreement between the parties to the joint adventure, the parties combine their money, property or time in the conduct of some particular business deal, agreeing to share jointly in the profits and losses of the venture, and with - a right to mutual control over the subject matter of the enterprise or over the property. * * * ””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Till v. Jones
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.