72 Ohio App. 3d 167 - Moore v. Retter’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 2006
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Bruni v. Tatsumi · Preston v. Murty · Smith v. Flesher · 20 Ohio App. 3d 41 - McQueen v. Goldey · 8 Ohio App. 3d 266 - Adamson v. May Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A party upon whom the affirmative of an issue rests is bound to give all his evidence in support of the issue in the first instance, and can only give such evidence in reply as tends to rebut the new matter introduced by his opponent. Potts v. First-Central Trust Co. (App.1940), 37 Ohio Law Abs. 382, 386 , 47 N.E.2d 823, 826 .” See, also, Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co. v. Mitchell-Peterson, Inc. (1989), 63 Ohio App.3d 319, 330 , 578 N.E.2d 851, 857-58 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.