72 Ohio App. 3d 43 - State v. Ball’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

13 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““[I]n determining whether the seizure and search were ‘unreasonable’ our inquiry is a dual one — whether the officer’s action was justified at its inception, and whether it was reasonably related in scope to the circumstances which justified the interference in the first place. iC # % * “[F]or there is ‘no ready test for determining reasonableness other than by balancing the need to search against the invasion which the search entails.’ ” (Citations omitted.)”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. 106 Ohio App. 3d 21 - State v. Vanderhoff

2. ““In order to conduct a lawful investigatory stop, the investigating police officer must be able to point to specific and articulable facts which when taken together with rational inferences from those facts reasonably warrants the investigatory stop.” (Citations omitted.)”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 106 Ohio App. 3d 21 - State v. Vanderhoff