72 Ohio App. 3d 522 - State v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
69 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently March 2026 · most notably 102 Ohio App. 3d 585 - State v. Carlson (1995), 98 Ohio App. 3d 549 - State v. Hollis (1994)
69 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Illinois v. Gates · United States v. Leon · Franks v. Delaware · Brown v. Illinois · Massachusetts v. Sheppard
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'While there is no arbitrary time limit on how old information can be, the alleged facts must justify the conclusion that the subject contraband is probably on the person or premises to be searched.'”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“name or describe the person to be searched or particularly describe the place to be searched, name or describe the property to be searched for and seized, state substantially the offense in relation thereto, and state the factual basis for the affiant's belief that such property is there located.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The finding of probable cause may be based upon hearsay in whole or in part, provided there is a substantial basis for believing the source of the hearsay to be credible and for believing that there is a factual basis for the information furnished.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Maranger
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.