Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 72 Ohio App. 3d 754 - Steiner v. Minkowski

72 Ohio App. 3d 754 - Steiner v. Minkowski’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
January 2024
most recently cited

23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently January 2024 · most notably Capella III, L.L.C. v. Wilcox (2010), 182 Ohio App. 3d 674 - State v. Dennis (2009)

23 state decisions

1001991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co. · Delfino v. Paul Davies Chevrolet, Inc. · Myers v. East Ohio Gas Co. · 38 Ohio App. 3d 79 - Craig Wrecking Co. v. S. G. Loewendick & Sons, Inc. · 63 Ohio App. 2d 76 - Siegler v. Batdorff

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As such, the landlord may elect to treat the tenant as a trespasser, or hold him to a new lease term. * * * When a tenant holds over beyond the lease term and pays rent according to the former terms, the law implies a contract on the tenant's part to hold over for an additional term under the same conditions which governed the prior term. * * * Although such the presumption is rebuttable, the new term may arise from the conduct of the parties regardless of the intentions of the tenant alone. * * * The election to hold the tenant to a new term lies with the landlord and his acceptance of rent implies an election to treat the tenant as a holdover. * * * Absent any agreement to the contrary, the new lease term is governed by the provisions of the original lease.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.