Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 72 OHIOST3D 354 - State v. Berry

State v. Berry’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

376
cited by 376 later decisions
2
states following
February 2026
most recently cited

367 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 376 later decisions — most recently February 2026 · most notably 98 Ohio St. 3d 44 - State v. Noling (2002), State v. Biros (1997)

367 state decisions

13001995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Dusky v. United States · Pate v. Robinson · Drope v. Missouri

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 376 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * the 'test must be whether he has sufficient present ability to consult with his lawyer with a reasonable degree of rational understanding—and whether he has a rational as well as factual understanding of the proceedings against him.'”
    19 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he right to a hearing on the issue of competency rises to the level of a constitutional guarantee where the record contains `sufficient indicia of incompetence,' such that an inquiry into the defendant's competency is necessary to ensure the defendant's right to a fair trial.”
    17 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Fundamental principles of due process require that a criminal defendant who is legally incompetent shall not be subjected to trial.”
    14 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.