Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 72 OHIOST3D 50 - Pond v. Leslein

Pond v. Leslein’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

75
cited by 75 later decisions
1
states following
September 2024
most recently cited

71 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 75 later decisions — most recently September 2024 · most notably Sikora v. Wenzel (2000), 114 Ohio App. 3d 746 - Didier v. Johns (1996)

71 state decisions

2901995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Smiddy v. Wedding Party, Inc. · Ziegler v. Wendel Poultry Services, Inc. · Tomlinson v. City of Cincinnati · Blair v. Goff-Kirby Co. · 127 Ohio St. 69 - Skinner v. Pennsylvania Rd. Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 75 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “there is evidence that the driver collided with an object which (1) was ahead of him in his path of travel, (2) was stationary or moving in the same direction as the driver, (3) did not suddenly appear in the driver's path, and (4) was reasonably discernible.”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““[N]o person shall drive any motor vehicle * * * in and upon any street or highway at a greater speed than will permit the person to bring it to a stop within the assured clear distance ahead.””
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “When a motion for directed verdict has been properly made, and the trial court, after construing the evidence most strongly in favor of the party against whom the motion is directed, finds that upon any determinative issue reasonable minds could come to but one conclusion upon the evidence submitted and that conclusion is adverse to such party, the court shall sustain the motion and direct a verdict for the moving party as to that issue.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.