State v. Reddick’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

3 federal appellate · 143 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 152 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[l]ack of effort or imagination, and ignorance of the law * * * do not automatically establish good cause for failure to seek timely relief.”

   13 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Monzo v. Edwards · State v. Ellis, Unpublished Decision (11-15-2005)

2. “a showing of good cause for untimely filing if the application is filed more than ninety days after journalization of the appellate judgment”

   6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Wellman, Unpublished Decision (10-10-2003) · State v. Loyed, Unpublished Decision (4-27-2005)

3. “[Sjucceeds and incorporates the good-cause requirement of Murnahan and former App.R. 14(B). Accordingly, an applicant who seeks to reopen an appellate judgment journalized before July 1, 1993 may not simply rely on the fact that App.R. 26(B) did not exist within the ninety days following journalization of the appellate judgment, but must show good cause why he or she did not attempt to invoke the procedures available under former App.R 26 and 14(B).”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Spisak · 127 F. Supp. 2d 899 - Van Hook v. Anderson