Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 72 Okla. 168 - Cusher v. Ricketts

Cusher v. Ricketts’s Empirical Analysis

1919

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
April 1952
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently April 1952

7 state decisions

4019191920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Egbert v. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. · Philip Carey Co. v. Vickers · Short v. Chaney · State Ex Rel. Hogan v. District Court of Thirteenth Judicial Dist. · Siddell v. McMillan, District Judge

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The court found that the deposit for costs had been exhausted, and made an order requiring- the plaintiff to make an additional deposit. The court found that the plaintiff had been notified of said order by registered mail, with a certified copy of said order to the attorney for plaintiff inclosed. The court found that no compliance had been made with the order. These findings are not even, disputed in the motion to vacate the judgment. The motion of the plaintiff to vacate said order gives no reason for not complying with said order, but relies solely upon the fact that the court was without jurisdiction to make the same. The motion, in so far as it states ‘that no notice had been given as required by law,’ states a mere conclusion, and does not attempt to state any of the facts, or deny that the plaintiff had received a certified copy of the order, nor in any way attempt to justify or excuse themselves for not complying with said order. The court did not commit error in sustaining the demurrer to said motion.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.