Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 72 Okla. 260 - McClintock v. Parish

McClintock v. Parish’s Empirical Analysis

1919

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
states following
March 1973
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently March 1973

17 state decisions

801919192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Robertson v. Smith · Walton v. Develing · Goddard v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. · Sivils v. Aldridge · Norris v. City of Lawton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Conversion is any distinct act of dominion wrongfully exerted over another’s personal property in denial of or inconsistent with his rights therein.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““The general rule seems to he that a want of jurisdiction of the court or officer granting the injunction constitutes no valid defense to an action upon the bond, or to the assessment of damages after the dissolution of the injunction.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.