Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 72 Or. 276 - Smith v. McDuffee

Smith v. McDuffee’s Empirical Analysis

1914

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
5
states following
August 1985
most recently cited

1 district · 20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently August 1985

1 district · 20 state decisions

8019141920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Griswold · House v. Jackson · Israel v. Brooks · Bogard v. Barhan · McIntire v. Levering

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In construing the language of deeds or other writings relating to real property, it has been held that the description of land therein contained was sufficient, if, with the stated instrument before him, a surveyor, either with or without the aid of extrinsic evidence, could locate the premises with reasonable certainty: Willamette Co. v. Gordon, 6 Or. 175 ; House v. Jackson, 24 Or. 89 ( 32 Pac. 1027 ); Hayden v. Brown, 33 Or. 221 ( 53 Pac. 490 ); Bogard v. Barhan, 52 Or. 121 ( 96 Pac. 673 , 132 Am. St. Rep. 676 ); St. Dennis v. Harras, 55 Or. 379 ( 105 Pac. 246 , 106 Pac. 789 ).””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““No law shall violate the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects, against unreasonable search or seizure; and no warrant shall issue but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the person or thing to be seized.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.