Dandova v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
January 2018
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Guin v. Ha · Austin v. United States · Commonwealth v. McCusker · 18 Cal. 3d 509 - People v. Berry · 47 Cal. 2d 406 - People v. Bridgehouse
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“insulting words, insulting gestures, or hearsay reports of conduct engaged in by the intended victim do not, alone or in combination with each other, constitute serious provocation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Luch v. State“naturally induce a reasonable [person] in the passion of the moment to lose self-control and commit the act on impulse and without reflection”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wilkerson v. State“conduct [that was] sufficient to excite an intense passion in a reasonable person in the defendant's situation”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wilkerson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.