Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 72 P3D 376 - Serna v. Kingston Enterprises

Serna v. Kingston Enterprises’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
August 2013
most recently cited

2 district · 12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Elbaor v. Smith · Aspen Wilderness Workshop, Inc. v. Colorado Water Conservation Board · Booth v. Mary Carter Paint Company · Lum v. Stinnett · People v. Eppens

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the only judgment against her [was] one to which she stipulated, along with conditions virtually ensuring her that it would never be enforced against her.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “common law duty of a principal to indemnify its agent for losses incurred by the agent while acting on the principal's behalf.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “'either through payment of a sum clearly owed or through the injured party's obtaining an enforceable judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.