Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 72 P3D 411 - People v. Carlson

People v. Carlson’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

23 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Berger v. United States · People v. District Court, Second Judicial District · The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant v. Frank D. RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee. · People v. Fuller · People v. Treat

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “occurs when the charged elements are unchanged, but the evidence at trial proves facts materially different from those alleged, and it is immaterial unless it prejudices the defendant's substantive rights). Third, before accepting a guilty plea, a court must ensure that a defendant”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Trial courts have considerable discretion in deciding on the admissibility of evidence, including application of the residual hearsay exception.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “We will generally sustain a conviction when the proof corresponds to the elements of an offense set out in the charging instrument.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.