People v. Carlson’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
23 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Berger v. United States · People v. District Court, Second Judicial District · The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant v. Frank D. RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee. · People v. Fuller · People v. Treat
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“occurs when the charged elements are unchanged, but the evidence at trial proves facts materially different from those alleged, and it is immaterial unless it prejudices the defendant's substantive rights). Third, before accepting a guilty plea, a court must ensure that a defendant”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Campbell“Trial courts have considerable discretion in deciding on the admissibility of evidence, including application of the residual hearsay exception.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Vasquez v. People“We will generally sustain a conviction when the proof corresponds to the elements of an offense set out in the charging instrument.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Huynh
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.