State v. Henglefelt’s Empirical Analysis
1948
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently January 1995
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Pinkerton v. United States · Thomas v. United States · Melby v. Anderson · United States v. Leatherberry · State v. Ripley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If two or more persons conspire... to commit any offense against the state of South Dakota ... and one or more of the parties do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each of the parties to such conspiracy shall be guilty....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“It appears manifest that ... it is an offense against the State of South Dakota to do that which is declared by the law of the state to be prohibited and criminal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.