Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 72 S.D. 574 - Hopp v. Thompson

Hopp v. Thompson’s Empirical Analysis

1949

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
October 1994
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently October 1994

10 state decisions

60194919501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Moberg v. Scott · Richardson v. Gage · State v. Bechtold · Johnson v. Gilmore · State v. Crawford

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “. . . “an innkeeper gives a general license to all persons to enter his house. Consequently, it is not a trespass to enter an inn without a previous actual invitation”, but, “Where persons enter a hotel or inn, not as guests, but intent on pleasure or profit to be derived from intercourse with its inmates, they are there, not of right, but under an implied license that the landlord may revoke at any time”. The respondent did not enter the hotel as a guest nor with the intention of becoming one and it was his duty to leave peaceably when ordered by the landlord to do so, and in case of his refusal to leave on request appellant was entitled to use such force as was reasonably necessary to remove him. [Hopp v. Thompson, 72 S.D. 574 , 38 N.W.2d 133, 135 (1949)] (citations omitted).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “This record presents a substantial conflict in the evidence. The jurors are the exclusive judges of the weight of the evidence and the credibility of the witnesses, * *.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.