72 So. 2d 796 - Hill v. Milander’s Empirical Analysis
1954
Citation profile
39 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably 421 So. 2d 151 - Askew v. Firestone (1982), 773 So. 2d 7 - Armstrong v. Harris (2000)
39 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Routt v. Barrett · Sylvester v. Tindall · Hyzer v. Ward
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that the ballot [must] be fair and advise the voter sufficiently to enable him intelligently to cast his ballot.”
13 later decisions quote this exact passage“[T]he voter should not be misled and [should] have an opportunity to know and be on notice as to the proposition on which he is to cast his vote.... All that the Constitution requires or that the law compels or ought to compel is that the voter have notice of that which he must decide.... What the law requires is that the ballot be fair and advise the voter sufficiently to enable him intelligently to cast his ballot.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“"[T]he only requirements in a [sic] election of this kind are that the voter should not be misled and that he have an opportunity to know and be on notice as to the proposition on which he is to cast his vote... . All that the Constitution requires or that the law compels or ought to compel is that the voter have notice of that which he must decide."”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.