Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

72 So. 3d 339

Arango v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 26, 2011

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2011-10-26

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 2013

1 state decisions

Relies on Renfroe v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2011-10-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NORTHCUTT, Judge.

¶1We affirm James Arango’s conviction and sentence for organized fraud. But, as conceded by the State, we must reverse the restitution awards that were entered after Arango filed his notice of appeal, which divested the trial court of jurisdiction. See, e.g., Renfroe v. State, 20 So.3d 1027 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009). On remand, the court may revisit the issue of restitution.

¶2Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

LaROSE and CRENSHAW, JJ„ Concur.
/72/so3d/339 · .json · Public domain