Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

72 So. 3d 850

In re Alfortish

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 19, 2011

Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 2011-10-19

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 2014

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2011-10-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

¶211 Considering the Petition for Interim Suspension filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel, the response thereto filed by respondent, and the ODC’s reply,

¶3IT IS ORDERED that Sean Daniel Al-fortish, Louisiana Bar Roll number 22227, be and he hereby is suspended from the practice of law on an interim basis pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 19, pending further orders of this court. Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 26(E), this order is effective immediately-

¶4IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that necessary disciplinary proceedings be instituted in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, §§ 11 and 19.

¶5IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the relief requested by respondent in his “Cross-Petition for Relief’ be and hereby is denied. Should respondent wish to avail himself of consent discipline in the future, he must comply with the provisions of Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 20.

¶6FOR THE COURT:

/s/ Marcus R. Clark /s/ JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
/72/so3d/850 · .json · Public domain