Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 72 SW2D 356 - Cousins v. Pullman Co.

Cousins v. Pullman Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1934

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
November 1953
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Caulfield v. Yazoo & M. v. R. Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In the Cousins Case, supra, which is directly in point on the questions involved in this appeal, it is said by the court: ‘The ■doctrine is well settled that where the contract of employment provides, as in the instant case, that a discharged employee may appeal to designated tribunals, he is bound to pursue the contract remedy and ■cannot properly complain to a court for redress, unless and until he exhausts that remedy, and shows an effective appeal, entitling him to reinstatement and compensation for wages lost.’ ” (All emphasis is ours.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.