Huff v. Huff’s Empirical Analysis
1934
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 1957
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Holland v. Nimitz · Monkey Grip Rubber Co. v. Walton · Holland v. Nimitz · International Traveler's Ass'n v. Bettis · VanWagenen v. Bonnot
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Do you find from a preponderance of the evidence in this case at the time the purported will sought to be probated was executed by Mrs. T. C. Huff she was induced to execute same by the proponents J. H. Huff, Mrs. R. H. Denny and George D. Huff, or either of them, in the exercise of undue influence upon her?”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Huff v. Huff
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.