Green v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
October 2013
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 21st Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on McFarland v. State · DeBlanc v. State · Mitchell v. State · Huizar v. State · Blake v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The State has introduced evidence of extraneous crimes or bad acts other than the one charged in the indictment in this case. This evidence was admitted only for the purpose of assisting you, if it does, in determining the proper punishment for the offense for which you have found the defendant guilty. You cannot consider the testimony for any purpose unless you find and believe beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed such other acts, if an [sic] were committed.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Graves v. State · Wright v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.