Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

72 S.W.3d 626

Van Buren v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 23, 2002

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2002-04-23

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently December 2018

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-04-23

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2William Van Burén (Movant) appeals the judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.0351 without a hearing. Movant contends his guilty plea was involuntary because his plea counsel promised him that he would only serve five years before he was paroled. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s decision is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Civil Procedure Rule 84.16(b).

¶3. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2002, unless otherwise indicated.

/72/sw3d/626 · .json · Public domain