Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

72 Tex. Crim. 44

161 S.W 115

Collins v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 19, 1913

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1913-11-19

<p>Unlawful Practice of Medicine—Statement of Pacts.</p> <p>r Where the purported statement of facts was not filed in the County Court until more than twenty days after adjournment of said court, the same could not be considered on appeal.</p> <p>[Rehearing denied December 10, 1913.—Reporter.]</p>

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1913-11-19

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently February 1989

6 state decisions

3019131920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PRENDERGAST, Presiding Judge.

¶1 Upon proper complaint and information charging appellant with unlawfully practicing medicine without having and recording his license therefor, etc., appellant was convicted and his punishment fixed at a fine of $50 and one day in jail.

¶2 The Assistant Attorney-General moves to strike out what purports to be a statement of facts in this case, because not filed in the court below until more than twenty days after the adjournment of court. Under the many and uniform decisions of this court and the statute, the motion is sustained and said statement struck out. Durham v. State, 69 Texas Crim. Rep., 71, 155 S. W. Rep., 222, and cases cited. In the absence of a statement of facts, no question is raised that we can consider.

¶3 The judgment is, therefore, affirmed.

¶4 Affirmed.

/72/texcrim/44 · .json · Public domain