Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 72 Wash. 2d 16 - Smith v. Seibly

72 Wash. 2d 16 - Smith v. Seibly’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
August 2006
most recently cited

2 district · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2006

2 district · 17 state decisions

8019671970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 70 Wash. 2d 304 - Grannum v. Berard · 7 Wash. 2d 246 - American Products Co. v. Villwock · In re Hollopeter · 61 Wash. 2d 107 - State v. Robinson · 62 Wash. 2d 420 - Cameron v. Boone

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]t is the duty of a party to make clear to the trial court what it is that he offers in proof, and the reason why he deems the offer admissible over the objections of his opponent, so that the court may make an informed ruling. If the party fails to so aid the trial court, then the appellate court will not make assumptions in favor of the rejected offer.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “age, intelligence, maturity, training and experience, marital status, control or the absence thereof by his parents, whether he was dependent or self-supporting and whether his general conduct was that of an adult or that of a child.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.