72 Wash. App. 237 - State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently May 2020
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 117 Wash. 2d 426 - Gaglidari v. Denny's Restaurants, Inc. · 88 Wash. 2d 13 - State v. Thompson · Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Duerksen · 38 Wash. 2d 475 - State v. Lutes · 5 Wash. App. 299 - State v. LaRue
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he provisions of the common law relating to the commission of crime and the punishment thereof, insofar as not inconsistent with the Constitution and statutes of this state, shall supplement all penal statutes of this state . . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. David“At common law, forgery was the act of falsely making or materially altering, with intent to defraud, a writing 'which if genuine, might apparently be Of 2 ' , NO. 75853-5-1/3 ' efficacy or the foundation of legal liability.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[U]nder RCW 9A.04.060 the rule of legal efficacy is a `provision of the common law' that `shall supplement all penal statutes of this state'.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. David
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.