72 Wash. App. 27 - State v. Hayden’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 98 Wash. 2d 384 - State v. Rice · 113 Wash. 2d 83 - State v. Shove · 121 Wash. 2d 655 - Matter of Personal Restraint of Williams · 67 Wash. App. 800 - State v. SS · 64 Wash. App. 469 - Matter of Detention of Chorney
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When sentencing a juvenile offender under the . . . (JJA), [chapter] 13.40 [RCW], the court may in appropriate cases suspend the juvenile’s disposition and impose a [SSODA]. RCW 13.40.160(5). An [sic] SSODA disposition places the juvenile on community supervision and ordinarily includes a number of conditions.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. T.E.C. · State v. TEC“fashioning supervised release for sex offenders, and it is particularly acute in the juvenile context, where it is well-established that to achieve the rehabilitative purpose of the JJA, the Legislature `built [flexibility] into the system to allow the court, in appropriate cases, to fit the disposition to the offender.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. TEC“a juvenile court's authority to modify the terms of the disposition can be implied from the general structure and purpose of the [JJA], even in the absence of a provision relating directly to the modification of a SSODA disposition.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. TEC
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.