72 Wash. App. 407 - State v. Wallway’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on In re Disbarment of Kleindienst · 117 Wash. 2d 93 - State v. Kjorsvik · 113 Wash. 2d 679 - State v. Leach · 91 Wash. 2d 342 - State v. Boyer · 119 Wash. 2d 143 - State v. Johnson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“What we have said is not refuted by the fact that it is possible to conceive of a case in which a person might cultivate, grow or harvest marijuana without knowledge of its identity. Commonly, manufacture of marijuana involves knowledge of the identity of the plant being cultivated. Rarely, it might not. Applying Kjorsvik's [ [2] ] liberal standard of review, however, we think that an ordinary accused reading a criminal information would contemplate the common situation, not the rare one, and that he or she therefore would be on notice that both manufacture and knowledge were being alleged.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Warnick“For purposes of this case, we assume that guilty knowledge is an element of the crime of unlawful manufacture of a controlled substance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Warnick“unlawfully manufacture a controlled substance, to-wit: Marijuana”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Warnick
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.