Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 72 Wash. App. 783 - State v. Mierz

72 Wash. App. 783 - State v. Mierz’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
2
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently July 2018 · most notably Marquis v. City of Spokane (1996), 127 Wash. 2d 460 - State v. Mierz (1995)

1 federal appellate · 31 state decisions

170199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Payton v. New York · Boyd v. United States · Oliver v. United States · United States v. Dunn

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “all species of the animal kingdom whose members exist in Washington in a wild state. This includes but is not limited to mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, fish, and invertebrates. The term "wildlife” does not include, feral domestic mammals, [old world rats and mice], or . . . food fish or shellfish ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Although a warrantless arrest may be effected where an officer has probable cause to believe a felony has been or is being committed or where a misdemeanor is committed in the officer’s presence pursuant to RCW 10.31.100, this statutory authorization only applies where the arrest occurs in a public place.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “A failure to move to suppress evidence, however, constitutes a waiver[ [2] ] of the right to have it excluded.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.