State v. Baker’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
1 district · 12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently March 2019
1 district · 12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc. · Connally v. General Construction Co. · Kolender v. Lawson · Patterson v. New York
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A statute is facially overbroad when it 'does not aim specifically at evils within the allowable area of government control, but ... sweeps within its ambit other activities that constitute an exercise of protected expressive or associational rights.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Burrell v. State“a court's first task is to determine whether the enactment reaches a substantial amount of constitutionally protected conduct. If it does not, then the overbreadth challenge must fail.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Burrell v. State“sweeps unnecessarily broadly into activity which has not been declared unlawful....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Robbins
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.