Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 720 F.2d 1542 - Scott v. Dixon

Scott v. Dixon’s Empirical Analysis

720 F.2d 1542 · 1983

Citation profile

52
cited by 52 later decisions
4
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably Ia Durbin Inc v. Jefferson National Bank Aia (1986), Bendiburg v. Dempsey (1990)

15 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions

3401983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 46 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Pierson v. Ray · Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co. · Stump v. Sparkman · Dennis v. Sparks

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “First, the deprivation must be caused by the exercise of some right or privilege created by the state or by a rule of conduct imposed by the state or by a person for whom the state is responsible.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “because he is a state official, because he has acted together with or has obtained significant aid from state officials, or because his conduct is otherwise chargeable to the State.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the party charged with the deprivation [is] a person who may fairly be said to be a state actor”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.