Gloster v. General Services Administration’s Empirical Analysis
720 F.2d 700 · 1983
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 287 · 28 U.S.C. § 294 · 5 U.S.C. § 2302 · 5 U.S.C. § 7513 · 5 U.S.C. § 7703
Relies on Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation Same · Terrell v. United States · Norton v. Macy · Gueory v. Hampton · Charles H. Young v. Robert E. Hampton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“require[s] an agency that proposes to remove an employee for misconduct to demonstrate a sufficient nexus between the misconduct and the job performance of the employee or others to warrant removal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Barnes v. Small“The nexus requirement is particularly strict in cases involving non-work-related misconduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.