Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 720 F.2d 839 - Skillern v. Estelle

Skillern v. Estelle’s Empirical Analysis

720 F.2d 839 · 1983

Citation profile

100
cited by 100 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
March 2016
most recently cited

45 federal appellate · 1 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 100 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2016 · most notably Tison v. Arizona (1987), Bottoson v. Florida (1984)

45 federal appellate · 1 district · 8 state decisions

6701983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Enmund v. Florida · Ungar v. Sarafite · Avery v. State of Alabama

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 100 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]e do not sit as a super state supreme court to review error under state law.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “If, in the attempt to carry out a conspiracy to commit one felony, another felony is committed by one of the conspirators, all conspirators are guilty of the felony actually committed, though having no intent to commit it, if the offense was committed in furtherance of the unlawful purpose and was one that should have been anticipated as a result of the carrying out of the conspiracy.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Enmund merely invalidates a death penalty when based solely upon a defendant's criminal responsibility for a killing by an accomplice that is unintended or not contemplated by the defendant; it does not invalidate a conviction of a substantive offense of murder when guilt is so based.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.