United States v. McCabe’s Empirical Analysis
720 F.2d 951 · 1983
Citation profile
27 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently December 2005 · most notably United States v. Moya-Gomez (1988), United States v. Whaley (1987)
27 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kotteakos v. United States · Caminetti v. United States · Mansion House Center South Redevelopment Co. v. United States · Romano v. United States · Anthony v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“defendant's argument for reversal must be based on 'newly-raised questions of law, untainted by factual ambiguity.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“to overcome the inherent unreliability of accomplice testimony”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.