Anwar v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
720 F.3d 1183 · 2013
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently July 2023
3 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 105 · 11 U.S.C. § 523
Relies on Baldwin County Welcome Center v. Brown · Norwest Bank Worthington v. Ahlers · Kontrick v. Ryan · Eminence Capital, LLC v. Aspeon, Inc. · United States v. Stanert
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“On motion of a party in interest, after hearing on notice, the court may for cause extend the time fixed under this subdivision.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“I love deadlines. I love the whooshing sound they make as they fly by.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he motion shall be filed before the time has expired.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.