Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 720 F.3d 1311 - Johnson v. Conner

Johnson v. Conner’s Empirical Analysis

720 F.3d 1311 · 2013

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
May 2017
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on McMillian v. Monroe County · Parker v. Amerson · Tinney v. Shores · 652 So. 2d 1142 - Alexander v. Hatfield · Forgione v. Dennis Pirtle Agency, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Alabama Code § 14-6-1 provides that persons, such as jail employees, who act or undertake duties at the direction and supervision of the sheriff are immune from state law claims to the same extent as the Sheriff “as long as he or she is acting within the line and scope of his or her duties and is acting in compliance with the law.” How should this court interpret “acting in compliance with the law” in order to not render the grant of immunity meaningless or the phrase superfluous? Specifically, what is the “law” encompassed by the requirement that a jail employee act in compliance with the law?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(1) to compel him to perform his duties, (2) to compel him to perform ministerial acts, (3) to enjoin him from enforcing unconstitutional laws, (4) to enjoin him from acting in bad faith, fraudulently, beyond his authority, or under mistaken interpretation of the law, or (5) to seek construction of a statute under the Declaratory Judgment Act if he is a necessary party for the construction of the statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.