Scimone v. Carnival Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
720 F.3d 876 · 2013
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1447 · 28 U.S.C. § 1453 (§ 5 of the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)
Relies on Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc. · Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. Moitie · Lowery v. Alabama Power Co. · Pacheco De Perez v. AT&T Co. · United States v. Murrell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'strictly construe the right to remove' and apply a general 'presumption against the exercise of federal jurisdiction, such that all uncertainties as to removal jurisdiction are to be resolved in favor of remand.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he burden of establishing removal jurisdiction rests with the defendant[s] seeking removal.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“We review an issue of statutory interpretation de novo .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.