720 F. Supp. 2d 342 - Ginx, Inc. v. Soho Alliance’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1658 · 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 1982 (Civil Rights Act of 1866)
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Patterson v. McLean Credit Union · Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc. · Village of Willowbrook v. Olech
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In every other case this Court has located, federal courts have declined to apply Anti-SLAPP statutes to federal claims.”); Chofetz Chaim Radin, Inc. v. Village of New Hempstead by its Bd., 98 F.Supp.2d 347, 360 (S.D.N.Y.2000) (rejecting application of Anti-SLAPP statute because”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“that the party both possessed sufficient authority to significantly interfere with the individual's ability to obtain contracts with third parties, and that the party actually exercised that authority to the individual's detriment”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“liability under [ Section] 1981 for interference with a third-party contract attaches only to persons who actually had the power or authority to prevent the plaintiffs from contracting with the third party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.