Tawdul v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
July 2019
most recently cited
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Pennsylvania v. Mimms · Maryland v. Wilson · McGee v. County of Orange · Norton v. State · 184 Ill. 2d 402 - People v. Gonzalez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]hen a party touches upon a subject in direct examination, leaving the trier of fact with a false or misleading impression of the facts related, the direct examiner may be held to have opened the door to the cross examiner to explore the subject fully, even if the matter so brought out on cross examination would have been otherwise inadmissible.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“[the police may detain the passenger in order to ascertain the situation and to alleviate any concerns the officer has for his or her safety.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Harper v. State · Starr v. State“[i]f probable cause or reasonable suspicion develop during this short period of time, then the officer may be justified in detaining the individual longer in order to further investigate.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.