Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 720 P.2d 1368 - State v. Tarafa

State v. Tarafa’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
February 2014
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently February 2014

14 state decisions

601986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Sandstrom v. Montana · Francis v. Franklin · State v. Kuhnley · State v. Troy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “reasonable juror could have been left in a quandary as to whether to follow the so-called explanatory instruction or the immediately preceding one it contradicted”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “called to the juror's attention matters which they would not be justified in considering in reaching a verdict.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “'no way of knowing which of the ... irreconcilable instructions the jurors applied in reaching their verdict.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.