State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 2006
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Neitzel v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“extreme indifference to the value of human life”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[Aln act "performed under cireum-stances manifesting an extreme indifference to the value of human life" is an act which creates a very high degree of risk and which exhibits an extreme disregard of social duty. It must be more than a erimi-nally negligent act and more than a reckless act.... [AJn example of conduct covered by this provision would be shooting through a tent under cireamstances [where] the defendant did not know a person was inside[,] or persuading a person to play "[Rlussian roulette".”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Carlson v. State“The defendant is only required to intend to perform the act; there is no requirement that he intend to cause death or that he know that his conduct is substantially certain to cause death.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Carlson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.