Dymenstein v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
1 district · 11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently June 2010
1 district · 11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on McClain v. State · State v. Andrews · Nukapigak v. State · Nukapigak v. State · Qualle v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Carter v. State · Reutter v. State“{there is no requirement that a witness possess a particular license or academic degree ... to qualify as an expert. The criterion ... is whether the fact-finder can receive appreciable help from that [witness].”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Carter v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.