Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 720 P2D 734 - Newsted v. State

Newsted v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
May 2010
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2010 · most notably Walker v. Illinois (1986), Romano v. State (1995)

4 federal appellate · 31 state decisions

1801986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Mullaney v. Wilbur · Burks v. State · Chaney v. State · State v. Wilson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the existence of a probability that the defendant would commit criminal acts of violence that would constitute a continuing threat to society”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[TJhis Court has reaffirmed its prior holdings that failure of a jury to indicate the basis of their finding of guilt was not error where there was but a single crime charged, ic. first degree murder. "Whether or not [murder] was committed with malice aforethought, or during the commission of a felony goes to the factual basis of the crime." When the jury verdict is unanimous that a defendant committed murder in the first degree, such a verdict satisfies due process. Further, there is no due process violation when all of the elements of the crime charged were proven. (citations omitted).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “that the Bill of Particulars contained insufficient notice of the evidence intended in support of the allegation of future dangerousness.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.