720 So. 2d 1230 - State v. Lewis’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 2015
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · State v. Dorthey · 603 So. 2d 739 - State v. Lobato · State Ex Rel. Graffagnino v. King · 643 So. 2d 1289 - State v. Kershaw
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[TJhere are no statutory or jurisprudential rules governing the formalities required when a trial court admits evidence. Traditionally, the party wishing to introduce documentary evidence would first have the evidence marked as an exhibit and lay a foundation for admission of the evidence. The proposed evidence would next be shown to the opposing attorney and then the proponent would offer the evidence to the trial court. At this point, the opponent may object to the introduction of the proposed evidence. The trial court must then rule on the objection and admit or exclude the evidence. McCormick on Evidence, Vol. 1, Sec. 51 at 195 (4 th Ed.1992).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.