720 So. 2d 14 - Al Johnson Construction v. Pitre’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 549 So. 2d 840 - Rosell v. Esco · 660 So. 2d 841 - Garrett v. Seventh Ward General Hosp. · 634 So. 2d 1365 - Town of Berwick v. Justilian · 651 So. 2d 301 - Pitre v. AL JOHNSON CONST. CO. · 682 So. 2d 1338 - Boyd v. Rouse's Supermarket
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(l)If an employee receives remuneration from: (a) Benefits under the Louisiana Workers’ Compensation Law. (b) Old-Age insurance benefits received under Title II of the Social Security Act to the extent not funded by the employee. (c) Benefits under disability benefit plans in the proportion funded by an employer. (d) Any other workers’ compensation benefits.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Such reading furthers what we believe was the real purpose underlying adoption of this Section: To prevent duplica-tive payment of benefits by a single or the same employer. The wording used in Subsection 1225(C)(1)(c) is clear and unambiguous. We do not possess authority to edit it by changing “an employer” to “all employers.” See La.Civ. Code Article 9.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“only to the extent the disability benefits were funded by that employer.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.