Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 720 So. 2d 232 - Johnson v. State

720 So. 2d 232 - Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably 830 So. 2d 792 - Pagan v. State (2002), 762 So. 2d 879 - Brooks v. State (2000)

33 state decisions

230199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 283 So. 2d 1 - State v. Dixon · 668 So. 2d 954 - Terry v. State · 714 So. 2d 411 - Urbin v. State · 457 So. 2d 1385 - State v. Overfelt · Tillman v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “presented in such a manner that the jury can distinguish the evidence relating to each defendant's acts, conduct and statements, and can then apply the law intelligently and without confusion to determine the individual defendant's guilt or innocence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “In deciding whether death is a proportionate penalty ... this Court reviews and considers all the circumstances in a case relative to other capital cases.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]he prior violent felony aggravating circumstance, although properly found to be present, is not strong when the facts are considered.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.