720 So. 2d 248 - Florida Bar v. Arango’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 690 So. 2d 1284 - The Florida Bar v. Lecznar · 644 So. 2d 1355 - The Florida Bar v. Reed · 486 So. 2d 551 - The Florida Bar v. Schilling · 693 So. 2d 550 - The Florida Bar v. Glick · 496 So. 2d 820 - The Florida Bar v. Morrison
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“although competent, substantial evidence supports the referee’s finding regarding the falsity or fabrication of certain evidence submitted by Arango, there is no finding as to whether the submission of such evidence was negligent or intentional or whether Arango manufactured or directed the manufacture of such evidence. After reviewing the record, there does not appear to be sufficient evidence to support a finding that Arango manufactured or directed the manufacture of false or fabricated evidence, nor does there appear to be sufficient evidence to support a finding that Arango intentionally submitted such evidence in the proceedings below. It is clear from the record that each item of evidence in question was prepared by ... Arango’s paralegal [i.e., not Arango himself]....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.