Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

720 So. 2d 323

Blades v. Henry

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 18, 1998

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1998-11-18

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 2007

1 state decisions

Relies on 583 So. 2d 1094 - Bensonhurst Drywall, Inc. v. Ledesma

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1998-11-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Petitioner is the defendant in a wrongful death suit. He was prosecuted on criminal charges arising out of the same incident, but was granted a judgment of acquittal. He seeks a writ of certiorari from an order denying his motion for protective order based on his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. Although he has already been prosecuted on criminal charges arising out of the same incident and granted a judgment of acquittal, he argues that he still has exposure to other criminal charges.

¶2The petition states that it is being taken from two orders, one entered on June 23, 1998 and the other entered on July 16, 1998, and is timely as to both of those orders. The respondent points out; however, that the petitioner filed his first motion for protective order based on the privilege against self-incrimination on February 2, 1998, and that his motion was denied on March 5, 1998. The petition is therefore untimely. Bensonhurst Drywall, Inc. v. Ledesma, 583 So.2d 1094 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)(petitioner cannot evade the time requirements for filing a petition for certiorari by filing a second motion addressed to the same issue determined by an earlier order).

¶3We therefore dismiss the petition.

KLEIN, STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
/720/so2d/323 · .json · Public domain