720 So. 2d 374 - State v. Colomb’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
October 1999
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Sullivan v. Louisiana · Henderson v. Brown · 277 So. 2d 126 - State v. Prieur · 425 So. 2d 1222 - State v. Trahan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the admission of testimony concerning the drug possession is prejudicial to the point of outweighing any probative value it may have....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“when it relates to conduct that constitutes an integral part of the act or transaction that is the subject of the present proceeding .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“no relevant reason, other than prejudice... for its admission into evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.