Gross v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 2002
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 246 So. 2d 771 - Richardson v. State · State v. Schopp · 697 So. 2d 805 - Consalvo v. State · 700 So. 2d 664 - Pender v. State · 515 So. 2d 256 - Allen v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A]ppellant's youthful offender sentence [on the grand theft count] ... is illegal, and must be reduced on remand to a maximum of a five-year total sentence of imprisonment and probation. See, e.g., Allen v. State, 515 So.2d 256 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987) (accepting appellant's argument that a defendant may not be sentenced as a youthful offender in excess of the statutory maximum sentence an adult may receive for the same crime, as correct).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Johnson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.